VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rajendra Pratap Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Education (Madhyamik) Lko. and Others

Consigned to Record
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
16 December 2023
Bench
Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
Case no.
CMRAD 253/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 3 Case :- CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. - 253 of 2023 Applicant :- Rajendra Pratap Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Education (Madhyamik) Lko. And Others Counsel for Applicant :- Pawan Kumar Pandey,Ajay Kumar Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. (C.M.A. No.1 of 2023)

1.Heard Shri Pawan Kumar Pandey, learned Counsel for the applicant/review petitioner and learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. As per Stamp Reporter, there is delay in filing the instant review application. Since learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondent has no objection if delay in filing the instant review application is condoned and cause shown by the applicant/petitioner in filing the instant review application beyond time appears to be satisfactory, therefore, the delay in filing the instant review application is condoned. Office is directed to allot regular number to the present review application. (Order on Review Application) The instant Review Application has been moved by the applicant/petitioner seeking review of the judgment and order dated 27.07.2017, passed by a Co-ordinate Bench comprising one of us (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dilip B. Bhosale, the then Chief Justice. The review applicant/petitioner has approached this Court by way of filing the instant review application after five years of passing of the impugned order. Learned Counsel for the applicant/review petitioner submits that the claim of the petitioner is covered for regularization under the U.P. Secondary Education Service Selection Board Act, 1982 and in case claim of the petitioner for regularization is covered, he may raise his grievance before the appropriate authority in accordance with law. The impugned judgment dated 27.07.2017 would not come in the way of the authority concerned in considering the claim of the petitioner for regularization, if his claim is covered under the aforesaid Act. In view of the aforesaid, the instant review application is consigned to record. . [Manish Kumar, J.] [Vivek Chaudhary, J.] Order Date :- 16.12.2023 -Amit K-High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.