- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 16 December 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 10995/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10995 of 2023 Petitioner :- Chandra Kumar Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Civil Secrt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijay Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel. Case of the petitioner is that he has sold his plot in favour of one Smt. Majida however his wife Smt. Geeta Yadav, respondent no.5 to whom the petitioner has divorced in the year 1984, is not giving possession of the said plot to the purchaser. Petitioner has approached this Court claiming mandamus commanding the S.H.O., P.S. Dalmau, District Rae Bareli to decide his application dated 04.11.2023 and do the needful. There is no provision of law under which such an action can be taken by the S.H.O. concerned. The only remedy available to the petitioner is to file a suit for possession. With the aforesaid liberty, the present petition is consigned to record. (Manish Kumar, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Order Date :- 16.12.2023 Arjun/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.