VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sangam Kumar Verma @ Sangam Verma v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
16 December 2023
Bench
Subhash Vidyarthiauthor
Case no.
14839/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 14839 of 2023 Applicant :- Sangam Kumar Verma @ Sangam Verma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Arvind Kumar,Ajay Deep Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.

¶1Heard Sri Arvind Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Shaunak Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records.

¶2The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.51 of 2023, under Sections 419, 420, 504, 506 I.P.C., registered at Police Station Mahmudabad, District Sitapur.

¶3The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 05.02.2023 against ten persons, including the applicant, alleging that the informant and his family members had made investments in STS/Sankalp Group under allurement of lucrative return but upon maturity the money was not refunded to the investors.

¶4In the affidavit filed in support of bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case on the basis of wrong averments made in the FIR. The informant had not made any investment in STS/Sankalp Group rather he had made investment in LLC Multistate Agro Co-operative Society Ltd., under various schemes under which they had to be given plots of land upon completion of investments for various periods. The investors did not deposit the complete amount by paying all the installments rather they filed the FIR.

¶5The applicant's criminal history of 59 cases has been disclosed in para 16 of the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, in 30 cases the applicant has been granted bail.

¶6The learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that co-accused Om Himanshu Gupta and Nandini Vishwakarma, have already been granted bail in the present case by means of orders dated 30.05.2023 and 22.05.2023 passed by this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.7084 of 2023 and 6651 of 2023, respectively.

¶7The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but he could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter.

¶8Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that two co-accused persons have already been granted bail, I am of the view that the applicant is also entitled to be release on bail in the aforesaid crime.

¶9Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed.

¶10Let the applicant-Sangam Kumar Verma @ Sangam Verma be released on bail in the aforesaid case, on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-

(i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;

(ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses;

(iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. Order Date :- 16.12.2023 Pradeep/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.