Mohd. Tahir Siddiqi v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ( Nagar Vikas ) Lko. and 2 Others

Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9603 of 2023 Petitioner :- Mohd. Tahir Siddiqi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ( Nagar Vikas ) Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Harish Chandra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Hemendra Kumar Bhatt Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no. 1 and 2 and Hemendra Kumar Bhatt, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.3. With the consent of learned counsel appearing on behalf of the contesting parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided. Instant writ petition has been filed praying for a mandamus commanding the respondent no. 3 to make appointment of the petitioner on the post of Tubewell Operator/Class III post as similarly situated persons were appointed since 03.04.2019. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent No.3 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no. 1 and 2 and Hemendra Kumar Bhatt, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.3 have no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before the respondent No.3 then the respondent No.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. Order Date :- 16.12.2023 Pachhere/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench