- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 18 December 2023
- Bench
- Rajnish Kumar
- Case no.
- 6299/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6299 of 2023 Petitioner :- Amarnath Gupta Respondent :- Incharge District Judge, Rae-Bareli And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anurag Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- Anurag Srivastava Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J. Shri Anurag Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed an application under Section 24 for transfer of Regular Suit No.152 of 2005 or Civil Suit No.3400 of 2022 to any other competent court on account of vacancy of court of Civil Judge (Jr. Division-4th). On a query being put, learned counsel for the petitioner failed to clarify as to how there are two numbers. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that despite the fact mentioned in the application that the Court is vacant and report has been called from the concerned court by means of the order dated 11.12.2023 and the case has been put up for hearing on 18.12.2023 i.e. today. However, learned counsel for the petitioner, on a query being put as to whether this fact was pointed out to the concerned court or not while pressing his application, shows his ignorance about it. In view of above and the first date fixed today, this Court is not inclined to issue any direction in an application moved on
11.12.2023, at this stage. However, the petitioner may press his application. With the aforesaid, the petition is dismissed. ...................................................................(Rajnish Kumar, J.) Order Date :- 18.12.2023 Haseen U. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.