- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 18 December 2023
- Bench
- Manish Mathur
- Case no.
- 9673/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 20 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9673 of 2023 Petitioner :- Shailendra Chaudhari Pno.No. 112080857 Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- M.P. Raju Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
¶2Petition has been filed seeking a direction to opposite parties to consider petitioner's case with regard to recommendations made in the Departmental Promotion Committee held on
14.12.2022 in the light of Government order dated 28.05.1997.
¶3It has been submitted that recommendations pertaining to petitioner in the DPC held on aforesaid date was kept under sealed cover due to pendency of criminal proceedings but is still in a state of limbo owing to continuing criminal proceedings due to which he is required to be granted benefit of paragraph 10 of the Government order dated 28.05.1997.
¶4For the said grievance, petitioner has already submitted a representation but seeks liberty to file a fresh representation before the authority concerned. At present, learned counsel for petitioner restricts his prayer for a final decision with regard to same.
¶5Considering the innocuous prayer, without entering into merits, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before opposite party no. 2 i.e. Deputy Inspector General of Police (Karmik), D.G.P. Headquarter, Lucknow who shall consider and decide the same within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority along with fresh representation.
¶6With aforesaid observations and directions, the petition is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 18.12.2023 Satish High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.