Rati Pal Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Prin. Secy. Revenue Anubhag 7 Lko. and Another

Court No. - 20 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9664 of 2023 Petitioner :- Rati Pal Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Prin. Secy. Revenue Anubhag 7 Lko. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of opposite parties. Petition has been filed for following reliefs:- "1. ISSUE, a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties i. e. opposite party no. 2 Collector, District Sultanpur to regularize the services of the petitioner on the post of regular Collection Amin against the 28 vacant posts of regular collection Amins in District-Sultanpur, and also grant the age relaxation to the petitioner in terms of the government order dated 22.02.2019, from the date on which the persons juniors to him namely Khetau Ram, Deo Narain Upadhyay, Ram Yash, Phool Chandra, Ramesh Kumar, Dharmendra Singh, Karunesh Singh, Tarkeshwar Tiwari and Gaya Prasad Dubey have been regularized with all consequential benefit of service and pay him regular salary on the posts of regular collection Amin in accordance with law.

¶2ISSUE, writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to not create any break in service of the petitioner and he may be allowed to continue work till his regularization and pay him regular salary in accordance with law." It has been submitted that petitioner was engaged in service as Seasonal Collection Amin on 6th November, 1996 and is continuing as such but is entitled to be considered for regularization as has been done to similarly situated employees and be granted same benefit which have been granted to similarly situated employees indicated in the prayer. For the aforesaid grievance, the petitioner has already submitted a representation but seeks liberty to file a afresh representation. Considering innocuous prayer being made by learned counsel for the petitioner and without entering into the merits of the case petitioner is granted liberty to file a fresh representation before opposite party No. 2 i.e. Collector, District Sultanpur In case such a representation is filed, the same shall be decided by a reasoned and speaking order within with period of eight weeks from the date a copy of this order is produced before the said authority. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 18.12.2023 prabhat High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench