- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 18 December 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Om Prakash Shukla
- Case no.
- WRIC 11066/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11066 of 2023 Petitioner :- Lalman Yadav And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy. Housing And Urban Planing U.P. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Devesh Kumar Verma,Vandana Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Namit Sharma,Ratnesh Chandra Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel, Sri Namit Sharma, learned counsel for the Lucknow Nagar Nigam, Lucknow and Sri Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel for the Lucknow Development Authority. Learned counsel for the respondents raised a preliminary objection that the petitioners have alternative remedy of filing an statutory appeal before the Chairman/Appellate Authority of the Development Authority, under Section 27(2) of The U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973. With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition is consigned to record. (Om Prakash Shukla J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Order Date :- 18.12.2023 Arjun/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.