- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 18 December 2023
- Bench
- Rajnish Kumar
- Case no.
- 6300/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6300 of 2023 Petitioner :- Shiv Prasad Tiwari And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Civil Sectt. Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Parijat Mishra Belavra,Chandra Shekhar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J. Shri Upendra Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel raised two preliminary objections; first of which is that the State of U.P. through District Magistrate, District-Amethi, who is defendant no.1 in the Regular Suit No.58 of 2023 has not been impleaded in this petition and the second objection is that the affidavit in support of the petition is also defective because the same has been filed on behalf of respondent no.4 also, which could not have been done. Shri Parijat Mishra Belaura, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file fresh after impleading all the necessary parties with correct affidavit. To which there is no objection by learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel and Shri Mohan Singh, learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha. Dismissed accordingly as not pressed with the liberty as aforesaid. ......................................... (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Order Date :- 18.12.2023 Banswar High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.