Ram Dayal v. Sri Ram Achal Kureel, Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Pratapgarh

Court No. - 4 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3057 of 2023 Applicant :- Ram Dayal Opposite Party :- Sri Ram Achal Kureel, Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Pratapgarh Counsel for Applicant :- Ravi Shankar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- Sampurna Nand Shukla Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.

¶1Heard Sri Ravi Shankar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sampurna Nand Shukla, learned counsel for the sole opposite party.

¶2Sri Shukla, learned counsel for the sole opposite party has filed affidavit of compliance, today in the Court, the same is taken on record.

¶3In compliance of earlier order of this Court, Sri Ram Achal Kureel, Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad-Belha, District-Pratapgarh is present in person before the Court.

¶4Along with the affidavit of compliance, Sri Shukla, learned counsel for the sole opposite party has filed an order dated

15.12.2023 (Annexure No.CA-1) passed by the Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad-Belha, District-Pratapgarh explaining the details of payment which has been made to the petitioner and also explaining the reason about the cheque of remaining amount of Rs.1,12,388/- which is being provided to the petitioner. The aforesaid cheque of Rs.1,12,388/- has been shown to the Court which has been handed over to learned counsel for the petitioner to provide the same to the petitioner.

¶5Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the aforesaid amount is not in terms of earlier order dated

28.03.2023 (Annexure No.2), therefore, the petitioner is entitled some more amount.

¶6Be that as it may, when the authority i.e. Sri Ram Achal Kureel, Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad-Belha, District-Pratapgarh has passed a detailed order indicating therein as to what amount should be paid to the petitioner and what amount has been paid to him and the cheque of remaining amount of Rs.1,12,388/- has been given, then there is no purpose to keep this contempt petition pending any longer.

¶7Accordingly, the instant contempt petition is dismissed.

¶8Notice, if any, stand discharged.

¶9However, if there is any calculation dispute, the petitioner may approach the Competent Authority, but for adjudicating the calculation dispute the Contempt Court may not pass any order. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 18.12.2023 Suresh/ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench