- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 19 December 2023
- Bench
- Manish Mathur
- Case no.
- 6328/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 20 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6328 of 2023 Petitioner :- Mohammad Sharik Respondent :- Civil Judge (Senior Division) Court No. 10, Distt. Bahraich And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Shukla Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner. In view of order being passed, notices to opposite parties stand dispensed with.
¶2Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to court concerned for early disposal of Succession Suit registered as Case No.97/70/2019 (Mohammad Sharik v. Jat Jaydad) instituted by petitioner.
¶3It has been submitted that as would be evident from a copy of order sheet that the defendants have already put in appearance on 15.11.2019 with time having been granted for filing objections but thereafter only general dates have been allocated in the matter, which is pending consideration for almost five years now and therefore directions are required to be issued.
¶4Considering the submissions advanced by learned counsel for petitioner and without entering into merits, opposite party no.1 i.e. Civil Judge (S.D.) Court No.10, Bahraich is directed to decide Succession Suit registered as Case No.97/70/2019 (Mohammad Sharik v. Jat Jaydad) expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from the date a certified copy of this order is brought on record of the proceedings, in view of fact that submissions advanced by learned counsel for petitioner are evidenced from a copy of order sheet and in case there is no legal impediment.
¶5Benefit of this order shall be available to petitioner only in case he cooperates in early disposal of the proceedings.
¶6With aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 19.12.2023 kvg/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.