Smt. Tripti v. Dr. Raja Ganpati R., Director, Administration, Medical and Health Services U.P. Lucknow

Court No. - 4 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4534 of 2023 Applicant :- Smt. Tripti Opposite Party :- Dr. Raja Ganpati R., Director, Administration, Medical And Health Services U.P. Lucknow Counsel for Applicant :- Anand Mani Tripathi,Anurag Tripathi Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶2Attention of this Court has been drawn toward the order of the Writ Court dated 25.09.2023 passed in Writ -A No.6994 of 2023, which reads as under:- "1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned State counsel for opposite parties.

¶2Petition has been filed seeking and direction to opposite parties to consider her case for transfer from District Kaushambi to District Banda in view of the Government Order dated 07.06.2023 requiring couple posting since the petitioner's husband in posted in Government service in Banda.

¶3For the said relief, petitioner has already submitted various representations. At present, learned counsel for the petitioner restricts his prayer for a decision with regard to the same.

¶4Considering the innocuous prayer, without entering into merits, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before opposite party no. 3, Director, Administration, Medical and Health Services, U.P., Lucknow, who shall consider and decide the same within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority along with fresh representation.

¶5With the aforesaid observations and directions, the petition is finally disposed of."

¶3Sri Sunil Bajpai, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has stated that however this is a contempt case and no notice has been issued but he has specific instructions from the Competent Authority, who is Director (Administration), Medical & Health Service, U.P., Lucknow, to the effect that by means of order dated 06.12.2023, the decision has been taken in terms of order of the Writ Court on the representation of the petitioner, the photocopy thereof has been provided to the Court and the copy thereof has been provided to the learned counsel for the petitioner. The photocopy of order dated 06.12.2023 is taken on record.

¶4In the wake of the aforesaid development, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant contempt petition.

¶5Accordingly, the instant contempt petition is dismissed.

¶6However, it is always open for the petitioner to assail the aforesaid order dated 06.12.2023 (supra), if she feels herself aggrieved from that order. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 19.12.2023 Suresh/ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench