- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 19 December 2023
- Bench
- Manish Mathur
- Case no.
- 6354/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 20 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6354 of 2023 Petitioner :- Barsatu And 5 Others Respondent :- Civil Judge (Jr. Division) Tanda Ambedkar Nagar And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Aditya Narayan Yadav Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J. Heard learned counsel for petitioner. In view of order being passed notices to opposite parties stands dispensed with. Petition Under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking a direction to the Court concerned for earlier disposal of original suit filed by the petitioner for permanent injunction. It has been submitted that petitioner is defendant no. 1 in the suit proceedings in which other defendants have also put in appearance although written statement has not yet been filed on behalf of certain other defendants as on date but since the proceedings are pending consideration since 2019, it is submitted that the aforesaid suit requires earlier disposal. Considering submissions advanced by learned counsel for petitioner it appears that suit proceedings are at the very inception and therefore no specific time frame can be directed. However, the opposite party no. 1. i.e. Civil Judge (Junior Division) Tandda District Ambedkar Nagar is directed to consider and decide the original suit No. 190 of 2019 Computerized No. 1200007832019 expeditiously without granting into adjournments to either of the parties. With the aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 19.12.2023 Satish High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.