Ram Pratap Singh v. Nitish Kumar District Magistrate, Ayodhya

Court No. - 4 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1894 of 2023 Applicant :- Ram Pratap Singh Opposite Party :- Nitish Kumar District Magistrate, Ayodhya Counsel for Applicant :- Amit Srivastava Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.

¶1Heard Sri Akhilesh Tiwari, Advocate holding brief of Sri Amit Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶2Sri Akhilesh Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the representation of the petitioner has been decided in terms of order of the Writ Court, however, the petitioner is aggrieved from that order.

¶3In the wake of aforesaid development, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant contempt petition.

¶4Accordingly, the instant contempt petition is dismissed.

¶5Notice, if any, stands discharged.

¶6It is always open for the petitioner to challenge the order passed by the authority concerned on his representation before the appropriate authority/ court of law. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 19.12.2023 Suresh/ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench