VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Umesh Kumar Pandey v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home, Lucknow and Another

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
19 December 2023
Bench
Subhash Vidyarthiauthor
Case no.
2953/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2953 of 2023 Applicant :- Umesh Kumar Pandey Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home, Lucknow And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Dr.Surendra Singh Chauhan,Anil Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.

¶1Heard Dr. Surendra Singh Chauhan, the learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Arpit Kumar, the learned Additional Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the State and perused the records.

¶2By means of this application the applicant is seeking anticipatory bail.

¶3The instant application has been filed by the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in F.I.R. bearing Case Crime No.556 of 2013, under Sections 120B, 193, 201, 409 I.P.C., & Section 7 & 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act,1988 registered at Police Station Mitauli District-Lakhimpur Kheri.

¶4Previously the applicant had been granted bail in the present case for offense under Section 419, 420, 467 and 471 IPC. After investigation the Investigating Officer added offenses under Section 120B, 193, 201, 409 I.P.C., & Section 7 & 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act,1988 and this application is filed seeking anticipatory bail in added sections.

¶5Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the FIR was lodged on 09.09.2013 and the applicant has already been granted bail in the present case on 13.11.2013; some sections have been added by the Investigating Officer after a period of more than a decade, on the same set of allegations, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be granted anticipatory bail in the added sections also.

¶6In view of the above, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant is allowed. In the event of arrest/ appearance of applicant-Umesh Kumar Pandey before the learned Trial Court in the aforesaid case crime, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing personal bond and two solvent sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of S.H.O./Court concerned on the following conditions and subject to any other conditions that may be fixed by the Trial Court:

(i) That the applicant shall appear before the trial court on each date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted;

(ii) That the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;

(iii) That the applicant shall not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.

¶8In default of any of the conditions mentioned above or it is found that applicant has obtained this order concealing any material facts, the Investigating Officer shall be at liberty to file appropriate application for vacation of this order. Order Date :- 19.12.2023 Vipul High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.