VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sunil Kumar @ Pintoo Tiwari v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
19 December 2023
Bench
Subhash Vidyarthiauthor
Case no.
15014/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15014 of 2023 Applicant :- Sunil Kumar @ Pintoo Tiwari Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Aman Kumar Shrivastav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.

¶1Heard Sri Aman Kumar Srivastav, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Pragya Nand Rai, the learned AGA for the State and perused the records.

¶2The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 486 of 2021, under Sections 323, 504, 506 & 308 IPC, Police Station Imliya Sultanpur, District Sitapur.

¶3The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 25.11.2021 against four persons, including the applicant, stating that while the applicant was in inebriated condition, he had he had abused the informant's son and thereafter all the accused persons had assaulted him with sticks and bricks.

¶4The medico legal examination report of the informant's son mentions two lacerated wounds in his parietal region and a lacerated would near his eye and a contused swelling and he has suffered a fracture in left frontal bone of head.

¶5An FIR bearing Case Crime No. 487 of 2021 was lodged from the applicant side also against three persons, including the informant and his injured son, alleging that they had beaten up the applicant and his uncle. The applicant and his uncle have received injuries in the incident, although the same are simple in nature.

¶6The parties belong to one family.

¶7The learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail application and he has submitted that the injuries caused by the applicant has been opined to be grievous in nature.

¶8Investigation stands completed and the police has submitted charge sheet in furtherance of the present FIR and also in furtherance of the FIR lodged from the applicant's side.

¶9Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the applicant and another person from his side have also sufferred injuries in the incident and coupled with the fact that the applicant has no previous criminal history and he is languishing in jail since17.11.2023 and without making any observation, which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid case.

¶10Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed.

¶11Let the applicant-Sunil Kumar @ Pintoo Tiwari be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-

(i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;

(ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses;

(iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. Order Date :- 19.12.2023 Pradeep/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.