VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Smt. Mamta v. State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and 3 Others

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
19 December 2023
Bench
Subhash Vidyarthiauthor
Case no.
1217/2022

Judgment

Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1217 of 2022 Applicant :- Smt. Mamta Opposite Party :- State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Dheeraj Awasthi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Dheeraj Awasthi,Manoj Kumar Yadav Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.

¶1Heard Sri Dheeraj Awasthi, leanred counsel for the applicant and Sri Anant Pratap Singh, lenared A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶2The applicant was granted interim anticipatory bail by means of the order dated 28.07.2022 wherein it is recorded that as per prosecution story, the co-accused persons Pappu is stated to have enticed away the minor daughter of the informant on 28.04.2022 at about 7:00 am.

¶3Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the FIR is delayed by about eleven days and there is no explanation of the said delay. He has also referred a complaint filed at Jan Sunwai Kendra and the name of the applicant was found missing from both of them. Learned counsel has further argued that although the statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. indirectly refers to the applicant but she has not been named in it. The applicant being a lady has been falsely implicated in the case as the main accused person is the driver of their car. Learned counsel for the applicant undertakes that he will cooperate in the investigation failing which the State can move appropriate application for vacation of the interim protection.

¶4Learned A.G.A. and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail but unable to dispute the submissions raised by the learned counsel for the applicant.

¶5The State has filed a counter affidavit but no such fact has come to light as would warrant variance of the order passed by this court.

¶6A supplementary affidavit has been filed by the applicant annexing therewith a copy of the charge-sheet dated 05.03.2023.

¶7Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the facts that the applicant was granted interim anticipatory bail in the present case; that the applicant has cooperated in the investigation; that the investigation stands completed and a charge-sheet has already been submitted and the applicant is a woman having no criminal history, the interim order dated 28.07.2022 is made absolute.

¶8The anticipatory bail application is allowed. Order Date :- 19.12.2023 prateek High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.