VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Udai Shankar Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Revenue, Lucknow and Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
19 December 2023
Bench
Shree Prakash Singhauthor
Case no.
6177/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 18 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6177 of 2023 Petitioner :- Udai Shankar Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Revenue, Lucknow And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashutosh Kumar Srivastava,Ratnesh Kumar Srivastava Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.

¶1Personal affidavit of Circle Officer, Bikapur and Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Milkipur, District-Ayodhya are placed before this Court and the same are taken on record.

¶2In compliance of the order passed by this Court dated

18.12.2023, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Milkipur District-Ayodhya and Circle Officer, Bikapur, District-Ayodhya are present before this Court.

¶3Sri Praful Kumar Yadav, Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the state submitted that in compliance of the order

12.12.2023, a team was constituted under the chairmanship of Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Bikapur and the said team along with the Circle Officer, Bikapur and Naib-Tehsildar, Bikapur and Inspector, Bikpur went to the spot and in presence of both the parties, indulge into the present litigation, the boundary pillars of the disputed land of gata no. 201, 239, 241 and 245 were installed after ensuring of the demarcation proceeding. He added now the order dated 12.12.2023 has been complied with.

¶4While tendering the unconditional apology on behalf of the deponents, he submits that due to unavoidable circumstances, the officers concerned could not appear before this Court, as was directed by this Court, vide order 12.12.2023.

¶5Learned counsel appearing for the respondent contends that the boundary pillars have not been removed by the private respondents as is alleged by the petitioner under his petition and undertakes that they will not remove the pillars.

¶6The Sub-Divisional Magistrate as well as Circle Officer, present before this Court submitted that they will ensure that the boundaries pillar which have been erected on the land in question is not removed again by the private respondents.

¶7In view of the aforesaid, undertakings, the instant petition is hereby disposed of.

¶8The personal appearance of Circle Officer, Bikapur and Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Milkipur, District-Ayodhya is hereby exempted. Order Date :- 19.12.2023 Mayank High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.