- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 20 December 2023
- Bench
- Rajnish Kumar
- Case no.
- 6379/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6379 of 2023 Petitioner :- Om Prakash Mishra Respondent :- Civil Judge (J.D.) Kadipur, Sultanpur And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Virendra Kumar Shukla Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for petitioner. In view of the order proposed to be passed this Court does not deem it necessary to issue notice to respondents as their interest would be well protected by the order passed by this Court. By means of the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- "(i) issue order or direction to the opposite party no.1 to decide the Regular Suit No.384/2014, Om Prakash versus Smt. Gyanmati and another within stipulated period pending before opposite party no.1 in the interest of justice.
(ii) Any other order, or direction, which this Court deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case, in favour of the petitioner be passed, in the interest of justice.
(iii) Allow the petition with cost in favour of the petitioner" This court on administrative side has already issued directions to the court below to obtain zero pendency of cases which are more than five years old. In view of directions already issued on administrative side, this court is not inclined to pass any further order on judicial side. However, it is always open for the petitioner to move appropriate application before the court before which the matter is pending for expeditious hearing showing urgency. In case any such application is moved within a period of week from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of within two weeks thereafter and endeavour shall be made to decide the Suit within a time frame. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 20.12.2023 Akanksha High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.