- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 20 December 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 11162/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11162 of 2023 Petitioner :- Veerendra Kumar And Ors. Respondent :- District Magistrate Barabanki And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Satish Kumar Misra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Raj Kr Singh Suryvanshi Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Mr. Raj Kr. Singh Suryavanshi, learned counsel for respondent no.3.
¶2After arguing at some length, learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner would be sufficiently met in case he is permitted to move appropriate application under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and the same may be decided expeditiously.
¶3In case petitioner moves such an application for demarcation, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate concerned shall consider and decide the same on the basis of proper survey report, in accordance with law, after hearing all the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, say within a period of 60 days from the date the application along with a certified copy of this order is filed.
¶4With the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of.
¶5It shall be open for the petitioner, in case he desires, may file stay application in the said proceedings. . [Manish Kumar,J.[ [Vivek Chaudhary, J.] Order Date :- 20.12.2023 -Amit K-High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.