VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

M/S Environ Waste Connections Llp, Ghaziabad Thru. Authorized Signatory v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl.Chief/Prin. Secy. Deptt. Medical Health and Family Welfare Lko. and Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
20 December 2023
Bench
Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
Case no.
WRIC 11230/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11230 of 2023 Petitioner :- M/S Environ Waste Connections Llp, Ghaziabad Thru. Authorized Signatory Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl.Chief/Prin. Secy. Deptt. Medical Health And Family Welfare Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anupras Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Abhinav Trivedi,Ashok Kumar Verma,Nitin Kumar Mishra Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.

¶1Power is filed by Sri Nitin Kumar Mishra, Advocate on behalf of respondent no.6 & 8 today and the same is taken on record.

¶2Heard Sri J.N. Mathur, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Anupras Singh, learned counsel for petitioner, Sri Abhinav Trivedi, learned counsel for respondent no.2 & 3, Sri Ashok Kumar Verma, learned counsel for respondent no.4, Sri Nitin Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for respondent no.6 and 8 and learned Standing Counsel for State.

¶3Petitioner has approached this Court challenging the Revised Technical Evaluation Report dated 21.10.2023 which was called by the Tender Committee.

¶4Admittedly, petitioner who is bidder claims that his bid is being disqualified and no opportunity of hearing is given to him after submission of said technical evaluation report dated

21.10.2023.

¶5Learned counsel for petitioner states that the said report itself is in violation of order of Supreme Court.

¶6Be it as it may since the technical report is an additional document being considered by the Technical Committee an opportunity to submit their reply/objection to the said report ought to have been given to petitioner and other similarly situated disqualified persons. The Tender Committee could not have taken a report without even taking views of petitioner and other similarly situated disqualified persons. Admittedly, the tender is not finalized as on date.

¶7In view thereof, respondent no. 2 and 3 are directed to provide a copy of technical evaluation report dated 21.10.2023 to the petitioner within a period of three days from today to which petitioner shall submit his reply/objection within a period of three days' thereafter with respondent no.3 and thereafter a decision shall be taken by respondent no.2 and 3 within a period of two weeks.

¶8It is made clear that Tender Reference No.UPMCL/BMW/RFP/2022-23/34 shall not be finalized without passing the order as provided aforesaid.

¶9With the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 20.12.2023 Arti/- [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.