Mahadev Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Revenue Civil Secrt. Lko. and Others

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11200 of 2023 Petitioner :- Mahadev Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Civil Secrt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Yadav,Rajesh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State.

¶2After arguing at some length, learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner would be sufficiently met in case he is permitted to move appropriate application under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and the same may be decided expeditiously.

¶3In case petitioner moves such an application for demarcation, the authority concerned shall consider and decide the same, in accordance with law, after hearing all the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, say within a period of three months from the date the application along with a certified copy of this order is filed.

¶4With the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of. (Manish Kumar,J) (Vivek Chaudhary,J) Order Date :- 20.12.2023 Ashish High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench