Janki v. State of U.P. Thru. District Magistrate Hardoi and 2 Others

Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9827 of 2023 Petitioner :- Janki Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. District Magistrate Hardoi And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prashant Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Prashant Kumar Singh Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing counsel for the respondent no. 1 and Sri Prashant Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondents no. 2 & 3. With the consent of learned counsel appearing on behalf of the contesting parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent No.2 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Standing counsel for the respondent no. 1 and Sri Prashant Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondents no. 2 & 3 have no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before the respondent No.2 then the respondent No.2 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order expeditiously. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. Order Date :- 21.12.2023 Pachhere/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench