Vijay Maurya and Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt., Lucknow

Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 3011 of 2023 Applicant :- Vijay Maurya And Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt., Lucknow Counsel for Applicant :- Awadhesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.

¶1Heard Sri Awadhesh Kumar Singh, the learned counsel for the applicants as well as Sri Manish Kumar Pandey, the learned Additional Government Advocate-I appearing on behalf of the State and Sri Vineet Srivastava, Advocate and Sri Sandeep Srivastava, Advocate appearing on behalf of the informant.

¶2The instant application has been filed by the applicants seeking anticipatory bail in F.I.R. bearing Case Crime No.987 of 2023, under Sections 307, 323, 504 and 506 I.P.C., registered at Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Gonda.

¶3The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 15.11.2023 against four persons, including the applicants alleging that all of them have assaulted the informant, her husband and brother in law because of a property dispute. Three persons have received multiple injuries in the incident although those are simple in nature.

¶4Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts do not warrant exercise of discretion of this court granting pre-arrest bail to the applicants. The anticipatory bail application of the applicant is rejected. However, in case the applicants file bail application before the court concerned, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law on its merits without being influenced by rejection of this anticipatory bail by this Court. . (Subhash Vidyarthi, J.) Order Date :- 21.12.2023 Ram. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench