VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Parmanand Shukla v. Sri Yamuna Prasad Superintendent of Police Barabanki

Dismissed on merits/Rejected
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
20 December 2023
Bench
Rajesh Singh Chauhanauthor
Case no.
CAPL 646/2021

Judgment

Court No. - 4 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 646 of 2021 Applicant :- Parmanand Shukla Opposite Party :- Sri Yamuna Prasad Superintendent Of Police Barabanki Counsel for Applicant :- In Person Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.

¶1Heard Sri Parmanand Shukla, who appears in person as this is his personal case and Sri Manish Kumar, learned Standing Counsel.

¶2Sri Manish Kumar has stated that considering the grievance of the petitioner for getting appropriate security, the Superintendent of Police, Barabanki has considered the grievance of the petitioner and passed the order dated

28.03.2021, on the basis of recommendation of Threat Perception Committee, whereby it has been indicated that in the light of Government Order dated 09.05.2014, the petitioner does come within the category of a person to whom the security should be provided, therefore, no order has been passed in favour of the petitioner by the S.P., Barabanki. Sri Manish Kumar has further stated that if the petitioner is aggrieved from the aforesaid order, he may assail the same before the competent court of law, inasmuch as the authenticity or validity of the aforesaid order may not be tested by the Contempt Court.

¶3The aforesaid submission of Sri Manish Kumar finds strength, inasmuch as the authenticity or validity of the order being passed by the Superintendent of Police, Barabanki, on the basis of recommendation of the Threat Perception Committee, turning down the request of the petitioner for providing the security, may not be tested by the Contempt Court.

¶4Accordingly, the instant contempt petition is dismissed. Notice, if any, stands discharged.

¶5However, it is always open for the petitioner to assail the aforesaid order before the competent court of law.

¶6It is needless to say that if the petitioner assailed the aforesaid order, he may very well explain the delay and laches apprising the Court that the contempt petition has been decided today i.e. 20.12.2023 [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 20.12.2023 kkv/ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.