Urmila and 3 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home and 2 Others

Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 711 of 2022 Applicant :- Urmila And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Dinesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ramakar Shukla,Subodh Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. Case called out. Nobody is present on behalf of the applicants to press the application. Sri Anant Pratap Singh, the learned A.G.A. is present on behalf of the State. The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed on

07.05.2022. The State has filed a counter affidavit on 26.07.2022 but no rejoinder has been filed till date. Section 438 Cr.P.C. mandates for an application for anticipatory bail to be decided within thirty days, but none present on behalf of the applicant s to press the application. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution. . (Subhash Vidyarthi, J.) Order Date :- 21.12.2023 Ram. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench