VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sadiq Ali v. State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
21 December 2023
Bench
Subhash Vidyarthiauthor
Case no.
15222/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15222 of 2023 Applicant :- Sadiq Ali Opposite Party :- State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Utkarsh Misra,Ayush Kumar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.

¶1Heard Sri Utkarsh Misra, the learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Jayant Singh Tomar, the learned A.G.A.-I for the State and perused the record.

¶2The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.675 of 2023, under Section 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., registered at Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Gonda.

¶3The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of F.I.R. lodged on 07.08.2023 against three persons, including the applicant, stating that the applicant had obtained a sale deed in his favour in respect of the informant's land by setting up some imposter in his place.

¶4In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent, he has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no criminal history.

¶5It has further been stated in the affidavit that the applicant is a bonafide purchaser for value and after it came to light that the sale deed had been imposted by some imposter the applicant returned the sale consideration, in lieu of which he was given two cheques of Rs. 1,50,000/- each, copies whereof have been annexed with the affidavit and the cheques have been returned by the a bank unpaid for the reason of insufficiency fund.

¶6The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer of the bail, but he could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter.

¶7Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and without making any observations which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail.

¶8Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed.

¶9Let the applicant-Sadiq Ali be released on bail in the aforesaid case, on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to the following conditions: -

(i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;

(ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses;

(iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Order Date :- 21.12.2023 Preeti. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.