- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 22 December 2023
- Case no.
- 10021/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 20 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10021 of 2023 Petitioner :- Brijesh Kumar Singh Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Its Secy. Deptt. Of Home Civil Sectt. At And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Upadhyaya,Anuj Pandey,Suyash Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner and Mr. S.B. Pandey, learned Senior counsel assisted by Mr. Varun Pandey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of opposite parties.
¶2Petition has been filed seeking quashing of the order dated
15.02.2023 whereby he was dismissed from service.
¶3Learned counsel for opposite party has raised a preliminary objection regarding maintainability of this petition in view of the fact that petitioner has remedy of filing appeal under Rule 28 of C.R.P.F Rules 1965 as well as revision under Rule 39 as well as under Rule 30 of the aforesaid Rules.
¶4It is also submitted that even otherwise this Court lacks territorial jurisdiction in view of the fact that impugned order has been passed at Assam.
¶5Considering submissions advanced by learned counsel for petitioner, petition is dismissed granting liberty to petitioner to avail alternative and equally efficacious remedy.
¶6Office is directed to return certified copy of impugned order to petitioner expeditiously. Order Date :- 22.12.2023 Subodh/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.