Guddu Balmiki v. Regional Provident Fund Comm. Employees Provident Fund Lko and 2 Others

Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9955 of 2023 Petitioner :- Guddu Balmiki Respondent :- Regional Provident Fund Comm. Employees Provident Fund Lko And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Surendra Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent :- Akhilesh Pratap Singh Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Akhilesh Pratap Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondents no.1 and 2.

¶2No notice be issued to respondent no.3 taking into consideration the nature of order proposed to be passed.

¶3With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is being decided finally.

¶4Instant writ petition has been filed praying for a mandamus commanding the respondents to correct the date of birth of the petitioner in the EPF account.

¶5The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the date of birth of the petitioner is 10.07.1987 but the same has erroneously been recorded as 01.01.1980 in his EPF account.

¶6Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before respondent no.2 which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned counsels for respondents have no objection.

¶7In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.2 then respondent no.2 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order.

¶8With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed off.

¶9It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. Order Date :- 22.12.2023 A. Katiyar High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench