- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 22 December 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 11365/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11365 of 2023 Petitioner :- Osama Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Civil Secrt. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anuj Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.S.G.I. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Deepanshu Das, learned counsel for the Union of India.
¶2A preliminary objection is raised by Sri Deepanshu Das, learned counsel for the Union of India that petitioner has an alternative remedy of filing an appeal before the Central Government under Section 18 of the Enemy Property Act, 1968.
¶3With liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal, present writ petition is consigned to record. However, petitioner may also file a stay application along with the appeal, in case he so desires. In such such a stay application is moved, the same shall be considered and decided by the appellate authority in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from the date a certified copy of this order along with appeal is placed before the appellate authority. [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 22.12.2023 Sachin High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.