Akanksha Pandey v. Madhyamik Siksha Parishad,Regional Office, Varanasi Thru Secy. and Others

Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11452 of 2023 Petitioner :- Akanksha Pandey Respondent :- Madhyamik Siksha Parishad,Regional Office, Varanasi Thru Secy. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Nath Pandey,Jitesh Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondents no. 1 to 2. No notice be issued to respondent no. 3 taking into consideration the nature of order proposed to be passed. The instant writ petition has been filed praying for a writ of mandamus for direction to the respondent no. 1 to correct the name of the petitioner in mark sheet and certificate of intermediate in the interest of justice. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the reliefs sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before the respondent no.1 i.e. Madhyamik Siksha Parishad,Regional Office, Varanasi Through it Secretary which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned Counsel for the respondents has no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.1 then respondent no.1 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and the relevant rules within a further period of six weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner. Order Date :- 22.12.2023 Mohit Singh/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench