- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 22 December 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 11432/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11432 of 2023 Petitioner :- Satish Chandra Sharma Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Civil Secrt. Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pankaj Dheer Singh Rana,Ajay Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Aatreya Tripathi Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Petitioner has approached this Court claiming that private respondents are interfering in the proper running of the affairs of temple. Learned Standing Counsel raises a preliminary objection that the dispute is between the petitioner and the private respondents, thus, it is not maintainable before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. In view of the aforesaid, writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate Court/Forum. (Manish Kumar,J) (Vivek Chaudhary,J) Order Date :- 22.12.2023 Ashish High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.