VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Madhuri Dwivedi v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Awas and Shahri Niyojan Lko. and 4 Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
22 December 2023
Bench
Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
Case no.
WRIC 11522/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11522 of 2023 Petitioner :- Madhuri Dwivedi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Awas And Shahri Niyojan Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shrawan Kumar,Deepshikha Singh,Lavlesh Giri,Ramesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ratnesh Chandra Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Sri Akhilesh Srivastava, Advocate has filed power on behalf of respondent no.2 to 5 and the same is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, Sri Akhilesh Srivastava, learned counsel for respondents no.2 to 4 and learned standing counsel for State. Present writ petition is filed by the petitioner for the following primary relief:- "(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to the effect that opposite party No.2 may allot the Land/Plot to the petitioner is sector-1 or sector-4 Gomti Nagar Vistar Yojna, under the scheme of Rehabilitation and Resettlement of displaced person." Learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner would be sufficiently met in case representation of petitioner for the said purposes is considered and decided in a time bound manner. Learned counsel for respondents have no objection to the same. In view thereof, petitioner is permitted to make a fresh detailed representation to respondent no.3 Secretary, Lucknow Vikas Pradhikaran, Vipin Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow, raising all her grievance, annexing therewith all the documents in support of her claim within a period of two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. In case such a representation is moved by petitioner, respondent no.3 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order along with representation is placed before him. It is made clear that this court has not applied itself on the merits of the case and all questions are left open to be considered and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 22.12.2023 Arti/- [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.