Dhiraj Bahadur Singh Yadav v. State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko

Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15252 of 2023 Applicant :- Dhiraj Bahadur Singh Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Arvind Kumar,Ajay Deep Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.

¶1Heard Sri Arvind Kumar, the learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Jayant Singh Tomar, the learned A.G.A.-I for the State and perused the records.

¶2The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 330 of 2020, under Section 409, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506, 120-B IPC, Police Station Vibhuti Khand, Lucknow.

¶3The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 26.07.2020 against eight named persons, not including the applicant, stating that the informant had made some investments in Vishwas Trading Company Pvt. Ltd. but upon maturity, no returns were paid.

¶4In the affidavit filed in support of bail application it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case.The applicant's involvement in 30 other cases has been disclosed in para 24 of the affidavit, in 1 of which he has already been granted bail.

¶5It has been stated in the affidavit that the applicant is neither a director nor any other position holder in the aforesaid company and in fact he had also made some investments in the company and he had been duped by the company.

¶6The applicant has been implicated merely after recording in the case diary that he is also involved in commission of the offence without assigning any specific role of the applicant.

¶7The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but he could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter.

¶8Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and without making any observation, which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid case.

¶9Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed.

¶10Let the applicant-Dhiraj Bahadur Singh Yadav be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-

(i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;

(ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses;

(iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. Order Date :- 22.12.2023 Pradeep/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench