VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Harivansh Verma @ Satish Sharma v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
22 December 2023
Bench
Subhash Vidyarthiauthor
Case no.
15284/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15284 of 2023 Applicant :- Harivansh Verma @ Satish Sharma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Praveen Kumar Srivastav,Vinay Prakash Katiyar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.

¶1Heard Sri Praveen Kumar Srivastav, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Rakesh Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records.

¶2The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.0566 of 2023, under Sections 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., registered at Police Station Vibhuti Khand, District Lucknow.

¶3The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 31.10.2023 agianst three persons, including the applicant, alleging that the accused persons had taken money from the informant and several other persons in the name of getting them employed and had given fake appointment letters to them.

¶4In the affidavit filed in support of bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent, he has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no criminal history.

¶5Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that neither the applicant's name is Satish Sharma nor is he Managing Director of any company, and allegations leveled against him are totally false. FIR does not disclose the exact amount paid by any person and the manner of payment and date of payment thereof.

¶6The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but he could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter.

¶7Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and without making any observation, which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime.

¶8Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed.

¶9Let the applicant-Harivansh Verma @ Satish Sharma be released on bail in aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-

(i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;

(ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses;

(iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. (Subhash Vidyarthi, J.) Order Date :- 22.12.2023 prateek High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.