- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 22 December 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 11558/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11558 of 2023 Petitioner :- Ram Singh Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Akhilesh Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
¶2After arguing at some length, learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner would be sufficiently met in case he is permitted to move appropriate application before respondent no. 3-Superintendent of Police, District Pratapgarh and the same may be decided expeditiously.
¶3In case petitioner moves such an application for redressal of his grievance within a period one week from today, the respondent no. 3 shall consider and decide the same, in accordance with law, after hearing all the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, say within a period of four weeks from the date the application along with a certified copy of this order is filed.
¶4With the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of. (Manish Kumar,J) (Vivek Chaudhary,J) Order Date :- 22.12.2023 Ashish High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.