Dilshad v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko

Court No. - 14 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 14647 of 2023 Applicant :- Dilshad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko Counsel for Applicant :- Rehan Ahmad Siddiqui Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan,J.

¶1Learned A.G.A. informs that he has procured complete instructions in the matter including upto date case diary.

¶2Heard learned counsel for the accused-applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶3This bail application has been moved on behalf of the accused/applicant-Dilshad for grant of bail, in Case Crime No. 296 of 2020, under Section 2(b)XVII/3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Tambour, District Sitapur, during pendency of trial.

¶4Learned counsel for accused-applicant while pressing the bail application submits that the accused-applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case as well as in the two cases mentioned in the gang chart. However, in all these cases mentioned in the gang chart, he has been released on bail and the bail orders with regard to these two cases have been placed as Annexure Nos. 12 and 13 to this bail application.

¶5He further submits that apart from these two cases, the complicity of the applicant is also shown with regard to other 12 criminal case(s), however, 11 of such cases have been explained in para no. 9 to 19 of the bail application and the bail orders pertaining to these cases have also been placed on record. One case is pertaining to the U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 bearing Case Crime No. 342 of 2018. However, the applicant has not received any process with regard to the said case and he is not an absconder so far as the Case Crime No. 342 of 2018 is concerned and apart from the above mentioned cases, the applicant is not involved in any other criminal case.

¶6It is also submitted that the applicant is in jail in this matter since 16.10.2023 and having regard to the fact that only on the basis of above-mentioned criminal case(s), the provisions of Gangster Act has been invoked against the applicant and the material which has been made the basis of lodging the first information report in this case is not sufficient enough to raise a presumption that the applicant is either guilty of the offences mentioned in the gang chart or may commit the same offences again if the facility of bail is granted to him.

¶7Learned A.G.A. opposes the prayer for bail of the applicant, but could not confront the factual submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-applicant.

¶8Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, it is evident that the provisions of Gangsters Act has been invoked against the applicant on the basis of two cases mentioned in the gang chart, however, in all the cases mentioned in the gang chart, he has been released on bail by the competent criminal court and the complicity of the applicant is also shown with regard to other 12 criminal case(s), however, 11 of such cases have been explained in para no. 9 to 19 of the bail application and the bail orders pertaining to these cases have also been placed on record. One case is pertaining to the U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 bearing Case Crime No. 342 of 2018. However, the applicant has not received any process with regard to the said case and he is not an absconder so far as the Case Crime No. 342 of 2018 is concerned and apart from the above mentioned cases, the applicant is not involved in any other criminal case. The applicant is in jail in this case since 16.10.2023. Nothing has been brought on record, which may suggest that the facility of bail granted by trial court pertaining to the offences mentioned in the gang chart has been challenged at any higher forum or has been cancelled by any superior court. The presence of the applicant could be secured before the trial court by placing adequate conditions/restrictions.

¶9Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the considered view that applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.

¶10Let the accused/applicant-Dilshad involved in aforesaid case be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:-

(i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

(ii) The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

(iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶11In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶12Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶13Observations made herein-above by this court are only for the purpose of disposal of this bail application and shall not be construed as an expression of this Court on the merits of the case.

¶14If it is found by the trial court that any information has been wrongly placed before this Court by the applicant with regard to the Case Crime No. 342 of 2018, the same shall be sufficient ground for the trial court to cancel the facility of bail of the applicant granted by this Court. Order Date :- 22.12.2023 Shravan High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench