VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Mohit Shukla and 3 Others v. State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
21 December 2023
Bench
Rajeev Singhauthor
Case no.
12464/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 12464 of 2023 Applicant :- Mohit Shukla And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar Tripathi,Amit Kumar Singh,V K Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.

¶1Counter afÏdavit filed by learned counsel for the private respondent is taken on record.

¶2Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶3The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is filed with the prayer to quash the proceeding of S.T. No.615 of 2022 pending before Special A.S.J./F.T.C., relating to Case Crime No.304/2020 under Sections 376, 313, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Tadiyawan, District Hardoi.

¶4In pursuance of earlier order, complainant of the present case is present before this Court and she has been duly identified by her respective counsel.

¶5Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that applicant and victim of the present case were major, as the victim was working as a teacher in the school, in which, father of the applicant was manager, they came in association and when this fact came into notice of father of the applicant then he restrained the entrance of private respondent in the school, as a result, F.I.R. of the case in question was lodged and in the medico legal report, no any pregnancy was found. He next submitted that marriage of the victim has already been settled with someone else and now she does not want to pursue the case and willing to lead his life in mainstream and resolve the issue by way of some written document. He also submitted that trial is a futile exercise, therefore, impugned proceeding may be quashed.

¶6Private respondent herself stated that her marriage is already settled with someone else and she does not want to pursue the case and requested that impugned proceeding may be quashed in the interest of her future life.

¶7Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer of the applicant and submitted that charge sheet has already been filed but he does not dispute this fact that victim is present before this Court and stated that she does not want to prosecute the applicant in the present case.

¶8Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, going through the record of the application, statement of the victim as well as counter afÏdavit filed by counsel for the private respondent, in which, she stated that her marriage has already been settled with someone else and she does not want to contest the present case as she is willing to lead her life in the mainstream, therefore, in peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, impugned proceeding of S.T. No.615 of 2022 pending before Special A.S.J./F.T.C., relating to Case Crime No.304/2020 under Sections 376, 313, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Tadiyawan, District Hardoi is hereby quashed and application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is allowed.

¶9Copy of this order be communicated to the trial court as well as S.H.O. Police Station Tadiywan, District Hardoi. Order Date :- 21.12.2023 Gaurav/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.