Sadiq Ansari v. Union of India Through Its Secretary & Ors

J U D G M E N T (oral)

¶1Vide the present petition, the petitioner is seeking following reliefs: "a.) Quash and set aside the Impugned Rejection Order dated

04.05.2023;

b.) The Petitioner be referred to any Central Government Hospital for re-measurement of his height;

c.) In case, the petitioner is found meeting the requisite height, as prescribed under the said Examination, 2022, respondents be directed to call the petitioner for third and last part, with regard to documents verification."

¶2The case of the petitioner is that the respondents have wrongly measured the height of the petitioner as 169.5 cms.

¶3However, when the petitioner got himself examined in the All India

W.P.(C) 6930/2023

Institute of Medical Science (AIIMS), the height of the petitioner measured as 171.5 cms. The Medical Certificate of the AIIMS is Annexure P-8 to the present petition.

¶4Since, there is a dispute in regard to the height recorded by the respondents in Rejection Slip and in the Medical Certificate issued by the AIIMS which is Annexure P-8 to the present petition, in the interest of justice, we hereby direct the Chief Medical Officer, Delhi High Court Dispensary to measure the height of the petitioner and send the report to the respondents within two weeks from today.

¶5It is made clear that the report of the Chief Medical Officer, Delhi High Court Dispensary shall be final and binding on the parties.

¶6We hereby make it clear that if the height of the petitioner is 170 cms, the respondents shall allow the petitioner to participate in further selection process.

¶7Accordingly, the present petition along with pending application is disposed of.

¶8Order dasti under the signature of Court Master.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE

(NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA) JUDGE

MAY 22, 2023 va

W.P.(C) 6930/2023 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 22nd May, 2023 + W.P.(C) 6930/2023 & CM APPL. 26964/2023 SADIQ ANSARI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashish Nischal, Mr. Arun Nischal and Ms. Rinku Shah, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Anju Gupta and Mr. Amit Acharya, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA