Goldi v. State of U.P. and Another

Court No. - 70 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9972 of 2024 Applicant :- Goldi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vivek Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for applicant; learned A.G.A. for State and perused the record.

¶2The instant Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant in Case Crime No.170 of 2024, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109, 121(2), 126(2), 115(2) Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, P.S. Bilaspur, District Rampur, during pendency of trial.

¶3After arguing the matter to some extent, learned counsel for applicant submits that present anticipatory bail application may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a bail application which may be decided in view of law laid down by Supreme Court in "Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922" to which learned A.G.A. has no objection.

¶4In view of the above, it is provided that in case the applicant, namely, Goldi appears before the trial court within two weeks from today and applies for regular bail, the same shall be decided expeditiously, in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in Satender Kumar Antil (supra).

¶5For the period of two weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against him.

¶6The petition is disposed of accordingly. Order Date :- 20.12.2024 Meenu Singh High Court of Judicature at Allahabad