Azeem @ Shah Abdul Azeem v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and Another

Court No. - 29 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2545 of 2024 Applicant :- Azeem @ Shah Abdul Azeem Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Farhan Ansari,Adarsh Singh,Shubham Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. Heard Shri Farhan Ansari, learned counsel and Shri Shubham Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Vinay Kumar Shahi, learned A.G.A.for the State. Shri Vinay Kumar Shahi, learned A.G.A. contends that prima facie the offence is disclosed from the F.I.R. as well as evidence collected during the course of the investigations. The applicant made various in-gestures to the lady victim. The victim has been terrified on account of the conduct of the applicant. Faced with this, Shri Farhan Ansari, learned counsel and Shri Shubham Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant contend that they do not wish to press the prayer sought in the application. They recast relief and submit that the applicant wishes to apply for bail before the learned trial court and invoke any other alternative remedy available to the applicant. It is always open to the applicant to avail remedies available to him in law before the competent court. In case such application is filed before the competent court, the same shall be decided expeditiously as per law. The Application U/S 482 is disposed of. Order Date :- 18.3.2024/Ashish Tripathi High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench