Bholu @ Qayyum @ Mohd. Qayyum Siddiki v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Court No. - 29 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2468 of 2024 Applicant :- Bholu @ Qayyum @ Mohd. Qayyum Siddiki Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Akhilesh Kumar Tripathi,Prashant Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. Heard Shri Akhilesh Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri S. P. Tiwari, learned A.G.A. for the State. The prosecution set out in the F.I.R. is that the applicant alongwith the co-accused forced their way in the house of the victim and assaulted as well as molested her and her family members. The applicant was nominated in the statement of the victim under Section 164 Cr.P.C. Shri S. P. Tiwari, learned A.G.A. contends that prima facie the case is disclosed from a perusal of the F.I.R. Faced with this, Shri Akhilesh Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant contends that he does not wish to press the prayer sought in the application. He recasts his relief and submits that the applicant seeks to invoke his alternative remedies before the learned trial court. It is always open to the applicant to avail his remedy in law. The Application U/S 482 is disposed of. Order Date :- 19.3.2024/Ashish Tripathi High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench