VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2024 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sparsh Gupta and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 2 Others

Dismissed on merits/Rejected
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
21 March 2024
Bench
Ajay Bhanotauthor
Case no.
A482 2675/2024

Judgment

Court No. - 29 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2675 of 2024 Applicant :- Sparsh Gupta And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Indrajeet Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Amit Kumar Srivastava Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. Heard Shri Indrajeet, learned counsel for the applicants, Shri Amit Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the opposite party Nos.2 and 3 and Shri S.P. Tiwari, learned A.G.A. for the State. Shri Indrajeet, learned counsel for the applicants and Shri Amit Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the opposite party Nos.2 and 3 submit that the applicants and the opposite party Nos.2 and 3 have arrived at a settlement. The applicants have paid the compensation of Rs.10,000/- by way of a bank draft in the name of the opposite party nos.2 and 3. The applicants are present before the Court. They acknowledged the selfless service rendered by the opposite party Nos. 2 and 3 who are specialist doctors posted in the Emergency Medicine Department of the Ram Manohar Lohiya Ayurvigyan Sansthan Hospital, Lucknow. Prima facie from the records, the Court finds that a contrite apology was submitted by the applicants and the amount has been given to the opposite party Nos.2 and 3 as part of the acknowledgement of harassing. However, it is clarified that no further action shall be taken against the applicants in any court of law on account of the aforesaid gesture. The parties are present in the Court. They have been identified by Shri Indrajeet, learned counsel for the applicants and Shri Anil Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the opposite party Nos.2 and 3 and Shri S.P. Tiwari, learned A.G.A. for the State. The litigation shall detract the opposite parties Nos.2 and 3 from their pious duties to the patients in the hospital. In this wake, the chargesheet No.1 of 2023 dated

21.03.2023 as well as the entire proceedings of Case No.49772 of 2023 (State v. Sparsh Gupta and others as well as the cognizance and summoning order dated

16.05.2023 and the bailable warrant dated

17.11.2023/07.01.2024 under Sections 323, 353, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station-Vibhuti Khand, District-Lucknow, pending before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Court No.26, Lucknow are quashed. The Application U/S 482 is allowed. Order Date :- 21.3.2024 Ashish Tripathi High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.