- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 4 June 2024
- Bench
- Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi
- Case no.
- A227 2898/2024
Judgment
Court No. - 4 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2898 of 2024 Petitioner :- Vaibhav Gaur And Another Respondent :- Nyayalaya Sriman Civil Judge Awar Khand Mahoday Kaiserganj Bahraich And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Adarsh Kumar Maurya,Adarsh Kumar Maurya,Alka Rani,Chandan Prasad,Rupali Srivastava,Shubham Yadav Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.
¶1Heard Sri Adarsh Kumar Maurya, learned counsel for the petitioners.
¶2By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kaiserganj, Bahraich to expeditiously decide the suit for permanent injunction having Case No.233 of 2021 (Vaibhav Gaur and another versus Ajay Kumar Gaur and others).
¶3From perusal of the order-sheet, it transpires that the case is already fixed for 08.04.2024. It has been noticed that earlier the petitioner filed a petition before this Court for transfer of the case from the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kaiserganj, Bahraich to some other court. The said writ petition was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 16.11.2022. It has also been noticed that while dismissing the petition, this Court observed as under: "............. It is expected that the trial Court concerned shall proceed with the matter with expedition and after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, but without granting any unnecessary adjournments shall endeavour to decide the suit at the earliest."
¶4In view of the aforesaid observation, no further direction is required to be passed in the present writ petition.
¶5The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. Order Date :- 4.6.2024 Abhishek Gupta High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.