Yaar Mohammad @ Yaar Mohammad Salmani v. Smt. Sandhya and 2 Others

Court No. - 4 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2854 of 2024 Petitioner :- Yaar Mohammad @ Yaar Mohammad Salmani Respondent :- Smt. Sandhya And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jay Prakash Singh Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.

¶1Heard Shri Jay Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State.

¶2By means of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India a prayer has been made for expeditious disposal of Original Suit for Sale Deed Cancellation bearing No. 516 of 2022 (Deen Mohammad and others Vs. Smt. Sandhya and others) pending since 5.9.2022 before the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Tanda, Ambedkar Nagar.

¶3It is urged that though several dates were fixed in the case but for one reason or the other, the Original Suit for cancellation of Sale Deed having Case No. 516 of 2022 (Deen Mohammad and others Vs. Smt. Sandhya and others) could not be decided.

¶4Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the court below may be directed to expeditiously decide the Original Suit bearing O.S. No. 516 of 2022 (Deen Mohammad and others Vs. Smt. Sandhya and others) in a time bound manner.

¶5In view of the order proposed to be passed in the present writ petition notice to private respondents is dispensed with.

¶6It is noteworthy, that this Hon'ble Court on administrative side has already issued directions to the Courts below to ensure zero pendency of cases which are more than five years old. In view of directions already issued on administrative side, this Court is not inclined to pass any further order on judicial side.

¶7This Court at this stage is not inclined to interfere in the matter under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. However, in the interest of justice, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Tanda, Ambedkar Nagar by moving an appropriate application detailing urgency for expeditious disposal of O.S. No. 516 of 2022 (Deen Mohammad and others Vs. Smt. Sandhya and others), and in case, if such an application is moved, the court concerned shall consider the same within a period of three weeks from the date of filing of application along with the copy of this order. It is provided that if the court concerned finds that a case for urgency is made out, it shall pass appropriate orders thereupon, in accordance with law.

¶8It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case on merit and the Court concerned shall decide the same on merit strictly in accordance with law.

¶9With the aforesaid observations, the instant writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 4.6.2024 Virendra High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench