Khursheed Alam v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Raebareli and Another

Court No. - 11 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5628 of 2024 Applicant :- Khursheed Alam Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Raebareli And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Arshad Ahsan Siddiqui Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.

¶1Heard Sri Arshad Ahsan Siddiqui, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶2The present application has been filed to quash the entire proceeding of impugned cognizance order dated 02.03.2019 by which applicant summoned under Section 394 IPC as also Criminal Case No. 634 of 2019 (State vs. Khursheed Alam & Others), as well as Charge Sheet No. 531 of 2018 dated

31.12.2018 relating to FIR No. 701 of 2018 under Section 394 IPC, Police Station-Kotwali Nagar, District-Raebareli.

¶3At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant does not want to press the prayer for quashing the impugned proceeding and want to surrender before the court below and apply for bail. He further submits that this court may be pleased to direct the court concerned to consider the bail application of the applicant, expeditiously, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this court.

¶4Considering the aforesaid submission, it is provided that if the applicant surrenders and moves an application for bail before the court below within a period of two weeks from today, then his application shall be considered in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in Satendra Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another, reported in

(2021) 10 SCC 773.

¶5For a period of two weeks or till disposal of the bail application, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant.

¶6With the aforesaid observations, present application is disposed of. Order Date :- 24.6.2024/Vinay/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench