VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2024 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Munish Kumar Alias Tyagi v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
27 June 2024
Bench
Subhash Chandra Sharmaauthor
Case no.
5722/2024

Judgment

Court No. - 4 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5722 of 2024 Applicant :- Munish Kumar Alias Tyagi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko Counsel for Applicant :- Dinesh Kumar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶2This instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant for directing the learned trial court to release the applicant by accepting only two sureties and not to insist the applicant to file separate surety bonds in each and every three cases and as mentioned in the application.

¶3It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in 7 criminal cases and has been granted bail by the competent courts, the details of cases are as under ;-

¶1Case crime no. 246 of 2023, under section 380, 457, 411 I.P.C. police station Sarojani Nagar, district Lucknow.

¶2Case crime no. 454 of 2023 under section 380, 457, I.P.C. police station Sarojani Nagar, District Lucknow.

¶3Case crime no. 516 of 2023, under section 380, 457, 411, L.P.C. police station Sarojani Nagar, District Lucknow.

¶4Case crime no. 398 of 2023, under section 457, 380, 411,

1.P.C. police station Gosaiganj. District Lucknow.

¶5Case crime no. 539 of 2023, under section 457, 380, 411, I.P.C. police station Sarojani Nagar, District Lucknow.

¶6Case crime no. 531 of 2023, under section 457, 380, I.P.C. police station Sarojani Nagar, District Lucknow.

¶7Case crime no. 11 of 2024, under section 3/25 Arms Act, police station Sarojani Nagar, District Lucknow.

¶4The Hon'ble Supreme Court in special leave to appeal Criminal No.8914-8915 of 2018 Hani Nishad alias Mohd. Imran alias Viccky vs. State of U.P. and Others had directed that the applicant who was an accused in 31 cases be released on bail taking one personal bond and two sureties.

¶5A prayer has been made by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant be also given the benefit of judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Hani Nishad (supra).

¶6This application is disposed of with the direction to the learned trial court to accept one personal bond and two sureties to its satisfaction in one criminal case against the applicant and such personal bond and sureties shall hold good in all the seven cases in which the applicant has been granted bail. Order Date :- 27.6.2024 V. Sinha High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.