Gyanu v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. U.P. and 3 Others

Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 654 of 2024 Applicant :- Gyanu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Abhishek Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J. Heard Sri Abhishek Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicantt and Sri Ashok Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A.-I for the State. This application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the applicant-Gyanu apprehending his arrest in FIR No. 0221/2021 under Sections 363, 366, 376D, 343 I.P.C. and Section 5/6 POCSO Act, Police Station Hyderabad, District Lakhimpur Kheri. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the applicant has prayed that the applicant may be permitted to file regular bail application before the competent court of law and direction may be issued to decide the bail application at the earliest in the light of judgment rendered By Hon'ble Apex Court in case of Aman Preet Singh vs. C.B.I. through Director, 2021 SCC OnLine SC 941 Considering the aforesaid innocuous prayer of learned counsel for the applicant, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby disposed off this anticipatory bail application finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the applicant to file regular bail application before the competent court of law within a period of four weeks from today and if such bail application is filed, the same may be considered and disposed of, strictly in accordance with law, with expedition without adjourning the case for any unnecessary reason. While disposing of such application, learned court concerned shall verify the applicability of the judgment rendered in re: Aman Preet Singh (supra) in the case of the present applicant and if it covers the controversy, the same may be considered. Order Date :- 18.7.2024 Arvind High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench