VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2024 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sunisha (Minor) Thru. Her Mother Kesh Kali v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
2 September 2024
Bench
Shamim Ahmedauthor
Case no.
257/2024

Judgment

Court No. - 16 Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 257 of 2024 Petitioner :- Sunisha (Minor) Thru. Her Mother Kesh Kali Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kapil Dev Srivastava,Deepak Kumar,Rohitash Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.

¶1Heard Sri Kapil Dev Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ashok KUmar Singh, learned A.G.A.-I for the State.

¶2This habeas Corpus petition has been filed with the following relief(s): "(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Habeas Corpus thereby directing the opp. parties to produce the petitioner detenue before this Hon'ble Court and further may records her statement by this Hon'ble Court."

¶3Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent No.4 has illegally detained the corpus, thus he should be called before this Court in order to set her free from illegal detention and confinement by the respondent No.4.

¶4Sri Ashok Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A.-I submits that the petitioner has already lodged an F.I.R. dated 28.06.2023 under Sections 363 and 366 I.P.C. bearing F.I.R. No. 0095 of 2023 against the respondent No.4. He further submits that the statement of the corpus was also recorded under Sections 161 and 164 Cr.P.C., thereafter Section 376 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 POCSO Act were inserted during the course of investigation. In addition thereto, he further submits that the custody of minor child-corpus was given to the mother by the order dated

19.01.2024 passed by the Child Welfare Committee, Civil Lines, Unnao. At present, corpus again went with respondent No.4 on her own sweet will. He further submits that the matter is pending for investigation before the police and the relief sought by the petitioner cannot be granted.

¶5After hearing learned counsel for the parties, this court is of the view that an F.I.R. dated 28.06.2023 under Sections 363 and 366 I.P.C. bearing F.I.R. No. 0095 of 2023 against the respondent No.4 and after recording the statement of the corpus under Sections 161 and 164 Cr.P.C., Section 376 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 POCSO Act were inserted during the course of investigation and after recording statement the custody of minor child-corpus was given to the mother by the order dated

19.01.2024 passed by the Child Welfare Committee, Civil Lines, Unnao. As informed by learned A.G.A.-1 corpus again went with the respondent No.4 on her own sweet will.The relief sought in the present habeas corpus petition cannot be granted, as the F.I.R. has already been lodged and investigating is pending. If the petitioner is aggrieved, he may approach before the competent authority for early disposal of the investigation of the matter.

¶6With these observations, this habeas corpus petition is finally disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail other remedy in accordance with law. Order Date :- 2.9.2024 Arvind High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.