Smt. Pushpa Anil v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. , Home U.P. Govt. Lko. and Others

Court No. - 7 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 85 of 2024 Petitioner :- Smt. Pushpa Anil Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. , Home U.P. Govt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Tribhuwan Kumar Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,Acting Chief Justice Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned State counsel for the respondents.

¶2Though the petition is ostensibly filed in public interest, the petitioner has not made due disclosure as required by sub-rule (3-A) of Rule 1 of Chapter XXII of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 which was amended in view of the judgement of the Supreme Court passed in State of Uttaranchal vs. Balwant Singh Chaufal and others reported in 2010 AIR SCW 1029.

¶3Hence, we decline to entertain the petition, since, we are not satisfied in regard to the bona fides and credentials of the petitioner.

¶4The petition is, accordingly, dismissed with liberty to file a fresh petition after making required disclosures, if so advised. There shall be no order as to costs. (Saurabh Lavania, J) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, A.C.J.) Order Date :- 30.1.2024 Ankit. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench